California jails receiving more state prisoners than expected
By Richard Winton and Andrew
Blankstein,
Los Angeles Times
November 16, 2011
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-11-15-jails-20111116,0,2298072.story
The number of state prisoners
arriving in county jails under California's controversial prison diversion
program is significantly higher than officials had estimated, adding new
pressure on sheriff's departments to figure out what to do with thousands of
extra inmates.
Prisoners convicted of some nonviolent crimes began serving their time in county
jails last month as California complied with a U.S. Supreme Court decision
requiring the state to lower its prison population by 30,000.
But the number of state prisoners being transferred has been much higher than
officials had predicted, prompting counties to speed up efforts to reopen
shuttered jail wings and find other arrangements for some inmates.
Los Angeles County was projected to add about 600 state prisoners by now but has
booked more than 900. The tally in Orange County is running more than double
what the state had estimated.
Based on the state's initial projections, Orange County officials believed their
jail system would reach capacity sometime in 2013, giving them time to find more
jail beds. But if the trend continues, the county could reach capacity by May,
said Assistant Sheriff Mike James.
In Kern County, the jail system got so full last week that the Sheriff's
Department freed 50 parole violators — including thieves — because they had no
jail beds for them.
"Instead of 120 inmates, we got 150 inmates extra in October. That adds up over
12 months," said Corrections Chief Kevin Zimmermann of the Kern County Sheriff's
Department.
County jails are receiving extra state funding to help house the prisoners, but
there are doubts about whether the money will be enough to avoid releasing some
inmates. Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca said he is considering a plan to
release some inmates who are awaiting trial and outfit them with electronic
monitors that chronicle their movements.
Other counties are also considering major expansions of house-arrest programs,
as well as channeling some nonviolent inmates into mental health and substance
abuse programs.
The L.A. County Sheriff's Department has the funding to open only an additional
1,800 beds, but the county is expected to receive 8,000 state prisoners in the
next year, according to an internal report by the district attorney's office.
That report also said the jails could reach capacity in December. Sheriff's
officials said that it's unclear when the jails will be full but that it could
occur in 2012.
Some counties, such as Los Angeles, are under court order preventing jail
overcrowding. So officials said it's almost a foregone conclusion that some
inmates will be released to make way for the state prisoners.
Orange County Sheriff Sandra Hutchens said none of the alternatives are ideal.
For example, she said, she's not sure how many inmates can be trusted to serve
time wearing GPS-monitored bracelets.
"The question is how many can be put out safely on electronic monitoring? We are
not going to have enough money to put everyone in jail. Jail is the most costly
alternative," Hutchens said. "In California, the public wants criminals to do
their full time, but no one wants to build more county jails and prisons. So
something has to give."
State corrections officials said they hadn't expected the plan known as
realignment to be a smooth transition because it is such an unprecedented shift.
They acknowledged that their estimates have been off but believe the surge will
be short-lived.
"We do expect that the overall jail admissions will level out," said Dana
Toyama, spokeswoman for the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. She
added that some estimates have turned out to be correct, including the number of
prisoners sent to San Francisco.
State officials and some sheriffs believe the higher-than-projected number of
state prisoners being sent to jails has occurred in part because defense
attorneys waited until realignment took effect to settle their clients' cases.
By doing that, the attorneys were assured that their clients would receive jail
time instead of prison time.
"We believe it has occurred because of publicity the realignment received.
Defense attorneys delayed a lot of adjudications until after Oct. 1," when the
law took effect, said Merced County Sheriff Mark Pazin, president of the
California State Sheriffs' Assn. "Those persons who pleaded guilty ended up in
the local facilities when under the old course of events they would have gone to
prison."
Many county officials say it's just a matter time before some inmates have to be
released.
Riverside County Sheriff's Chief Deputy Jerry Gutierrez said his jail is now at
93% capacity and will be full by January. In San Bernardino County, officials
are planning to significantly expands their work-release and electronic
monitoring programs, certain that the influx of state prisoners will force some
releases.
"We just started the biggest system change in the history of California
justice," said Nick Warner, legislative director for the State Sheriffs' Assn.
"Anyone who predicts with certainty failure or success is premature in that
judgment."