Rave On

 

“Rave On” is the title of one of Buddy Holly=s records from the 1950s, where he is singing about feeling good about being in love, dancing, and generally having a good time “rockin’ and a rollin’.”  Not so any more, for if anyone these days brings forth the word “rave” the dreaded drug warriors go into high gear and raid the place.  Why?  Well, good grief, drugs are being used, especially society=s new menace, “ecstasy.”  You know that drug, it=s the one Jessica Williams was using.  It has taken over where “reefer madness” left off as the “assassin of youth” (to quote from America=s first “drug czar” Harry Anslinger, the original head of the Bureau of Narcotics in the 1930s.)

Fast-forward to the modern era and you have so-called “rave parties,” where large groups of youths gather at various places and, like Buddy said, “rave on.”  And, predictably, the local drug warriors go ballistic and want to bust the place.  This “rave” thing - along with the drug of choice, ecstasy - has become the latest version of reefer madness.  This is what I might describe as a sort of “moral panic” where it is not so much what is being done (in this case, a group of people getting together and having fun), but who is having fun and the drug that is being used.

It sure is funny how once this gets going, there is apparently no stopping it.  The furor over these raves reminds me of a similar furor over “Satanism” in the 1980s.  I remember attending a workshop at UNLV where someone from the police department (who else?) sort of “raved on” about how Satan was invading every nook and corner of society and infecting our youths.  What ever happened to this menace?  It gradually disappeared from the radar screen, due to the simple fact that the threat never existed in the first place.  Oh sure, there were a few isolated incidents of a few kids getting all wrapped up in Satanism.  But this version of “witch hunts” went the way of all the others.

Now we have “rave parties” and the predictable “workshops” led, of course, by a member of our local police department - a member of the “drug warrior” clan (what gives them the credentials to do this escapes me).  As Las Vegas Mercury writer Mike Prevatt correctly notes, such presentations are a carbon copy of D.A.R.E. presentations, with typical exaggerations and dire warnings about the dangers of drugs, with the admonition that one need only be able to “Just Say No” and the problem will go away.  Well, we know what has happened to D.A.R.E.

What is important to note here is that this drug has been declared illegal.  However, as the history of drug legislation in this country shows, those drugs declared illegal have always been used primarily by those without much power (in the case of ecstasy, it is mostly young people).  Since this is a drug frequently associated with these parties (according to the police experts - and they should know!), then such parties ought to be invaded, if not outright banned.  Part of this problem is that the music that is played is claimed to “cause” people to use this drug.  Just like rock and roll was claimed to cause juvenile delinquency back in the 1950s and they even had Congressional hearings over this, even calling Elvis as a witness.

Of course, no one has suggested that you could logically make the same argument that bars that play country western music lead to drunkenness and alcoholism; or that regular gatherings at so-called “police bars” lead to all sorts of strange behavior and drunken orgies; or the use of hard liquor goes along with political gatherings among the nation=s elite.  But then, these “drugs” are OK, since they are used by “regular people,” including those who make and enforce the law, and those who have most of the money.  These people are the people that matter and we must not disturb them.

Enter Detective Todd Raybeck, the leader of the “workshop” on raves.  In a recent letter to City Life he claims that the drug war has been a success, in that drug use has declined since 1979; a 50% decline in fact.  All the while expenditures on the “war on drugs” has gone up about 20-fold during this time.  One goes up, the other goes down, ergo, there is a cause and effect.  Logicians and researchers should have fun with this one!  The consumption of milk, McDonald=s hamburgers, toothpaste, coffee, etc. has also gone up.  Any correlation here?  Of course, even the drug survey results Mr. Raybeck refers to are open to challenge; for starters, they typically exclude  those not in school and even those who are locked up somewhere - and a whole lot of folks have been locked up during the past 20 years!  By the way, for the record, the decline in drug use began well before the huge increases in the drug war which began in the mid-1980s.

Meanwhile, some 400,000 + people die each year from tobacco and at least another 150,000 from alcohol.  Not to mention all the alcohol-related crimes (alcohol is estimated to be associated with well over half of all major crimes, especially violent crimes).  And millions continue to use prescription drugs, many of which are quite harmful.  But we don=t send the drug warriors after the “traffickers” of these drugs.  According to the most recent figures, drug companies spent more than $2 billion on drug ads during the first 10 months of 2000.  Not to mention all the money their lobbyists funnel into politicians to make certain the drug warriors don=t come after them.  After all, “money talks.”

 

Written in 2002 as a comment to an article by Mike Prevatt of the Las Vegas Mercury, but never published.