Total
Institutions and Slavery
http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~jacobshu/Total%20InstitutionSlavery.html
(author
unknown)
DEFINING TOTAL
INSTITUTIONS
"A place of
residence and work where a large number of like-situated individuals, cut off
from the wider society for an appreciable period of time together, lead an
enclosed, formally administered round of life.” (Goffman)
(1) those
established to care for persons felt to be both incapable and harmless (e.g.,
elderly homes); (2) those to care for persons felt to be incapable but
unintended threats to the community (e.g., mental hospital); (3) those
established to protect the community against those who are intended threats to
its welfare (e.g., jails, POW camps, concentration campus); (4) those
established to pursue some worklike and instrumental task (e.g., army barracks,
ships)
-
Totality
can be symbolized by barrier to social interaction with outside; through
physical disconnect with outside world (locked doors, high walls, barbed
wire, forests, water, etc.
-
Though not
neat classification, nor exhaustive typology, we can view slavery as a most
total institution.
COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF TOTAL INSTITUTIONS
-
All aspects
of life are conducted in same place and under same single authority
-
Carefully
structured activities
-
Explicit
formal rulings govern structured activities
-
Activities
serve ultimate goal (economic profit; control over men/women)
-
Strict
demarcation of roles; hierarchical
-
Social
mobility between the two strata (inmate, “staff”) is grossly restricted
-
Even TALK
across the boundaries may be conducted in special tone of voice such that
inmates’ verbal behavior reflects their place in system of dominance
-
Just as
talk across boundaries is restricted, so, too, is passage of information –
especially about staff’s plans for inmates.
-
Little
choice in this total institution
-
In some
institutions, there is a kind of slavery with inmate’ full time placed at
convenience of staff; here inmates’ sense of self and sense of possession
can become contaminated
-
Total
Institutions are incompatible with family; hard to maintain; constraints on
family formations.
Inmate World
within Total Institution
-
Typical for
inmates to come with a “presenting culture” derived from a “home world” And
this is the point made by Atiba in noting that perhaps section on African
Diaspora; continuities is too far in the lecture; important to remember
where descendents came from. Diverse; diversity of tongues; cultures
-
Integration
into total institution may entail a kind of “disculturation” – an
“Untraining” if you will – which makes it difficult for person to adjust to
his old way of life (disconnect of African Americans with African homelands)
-
Can create
tensions between total Institution and homeworld; some losses are
irrevocable (Africanisms in American culture versus??)
-
Admission
to T.I. entail “trimming” or “Programming” – because new arrival [allows
himself] to be shaped and coded into an object that can be fed into
administrative machinery of establishment (change in clothing, hair style,
etc.).
-
May involve
“obedience tests” at outset
-
Possessions
are taken; and with that one’s sense of self
-
Stripped of
“usual” appearance
-
May suffer
personal self defacement; stripped of one’s “identity kit”
-
Certain
movements, postures, and stances will convey lowly images of the individual
-
Physical
stance – required to hold body in humiliating pose; perform verbal acts of
deference (e.g., saying “sir”, begging, humbly asking for little things like
permission to drink water)
Contaminating
Exposures
Contaminative exposure: All encompassing nature of institution reinforce
system – VISITORS/outsiders witness them in this position “contaminative
exposure”
-
Physical
contamination: unclean food, soiled towels, messy quarters
-
Interpersonal contamination: Forced social relationships. When inmate
loses control over who observes him in his/her predicament, or who knows of
his/her past, he is being contaminated by a forced relationship to these
people for it is through such knowledge and perception that relations are
expressed.
-
Inmate thus
undergoes mortification of self by contaminative exposure of a physical and
interpersonal kind.
-
More overt
cases of interpersonal contamination; forced relationships (rape,
molestation, when one’s possessions are pawed over by official, contact with
undesirable fellow inmates)
-
Less direct
source of mortification: LOOPING
-
Individual find that his protective response to an assault upon self is
collapsed into the situation; cannot defend himself in usual way by
establishing distance between mortifying situation and himself.
-
Through
looping, an inmate’s reaction to his own situation is collapse back into
this situation itself; and he is not allowed to retain the usual
segregation of these phases of action.
-
Agency
further lost by virtue of regimentation and tyrannization.
-
"Echelon” authority: ANY member of staff class has certain rights to
discipline ANY member of the inmate class. In slavery, ALL staff
produce children who become staff by virtue of their ascribed status.
CONCLUSION:
-
Total
institution strips person of agency, belief that he has any command over his
world; that he is a person with “adult” self determination, autonomy, and
freedom of action.
-
Inmates
must show internalization of the worldview of the staff
-
Inmate’s
use of speech also show their personal inefficacy
-
External
Mortification is complimented by self/internal mortification
-
AND
mortification officially rationalized on groups of sanitation, security,
it’s for their own good.
SLAVERY AS A
TOTAL INSTITUTION
Lester: to be a
slave; the Plantation
1.
To be a human being under conditions in which that humanity was denied
2. Slavery seen as benefit to slaves (dumb, brute animals, whose sole
attributes were working, singing, and dancing)
3. Since they were like children, slavery benefited them
TESTIMONIES
SHOW THAT:
-
Slaves were
nameless (only initials)
-
Unable to
retaliate (looping, external mortification
-
No control
-
Internalization of view of slaveholder;
-
Privilege
of “mixed” blood; allow some room for social mobility among class of slaves
-
Other
slaves forced to be complicit in system; forced to whip others (though find
way to subvert expectations) – interpersonal contamination
-
Ascribed
lot
-
Actually
resisted ascribed lot